When Tom Miller wanted a Web
site for his $1-million health-care consultancy, in Clifton,
N.J., he turned to the advertising agency he'd worked with for
two years. "We were looking to get a discount price," he
recalls. It took the agency, which Miller refuses to name,
more than six months to launch a site, at a cost of more than
$3,000. Since then, he's scrapped the site, which he
disparaged for having poor graphic design (he wanted more
color, less copy) and for not illustrating the company's
purpose accurately. In the end he hired another Web shop to
create a new site for $15,000.
At first glance, Miller's lesson seems like a blend of two
clichés: "buyer, beware" and "penny-wise, pound-foolish." But
in the world of Web-site design, only the first is always
true.
Take the case of John Ahrens. He also spent $3,000 on a
site, but he came away pleased. His company, Zetet, a
personal-digital-assistant-software developer in Plano, Tex.,
needed a no-frills Web presence on a start-up budget. He
indicated he'd pay $3,000 for a "simple 10- to 15-page site,
no E-commerce, no database." An independent designer won the
bid and in three weeks produced a site that the Zetet founder
calls "crisp and professional."
What does it mean if for $3,000 one customer feels ripped
off and another rewarded? It means that when it comes to
designing and building Web sites, rates are not the
only way to judge vendor quality. In fact, they may be the
worst way to gauge it.
Getting What You Pay For
Web-shop owners agree that site pricing generally falls into
three broad categories. For the sake of clarity, let's call
them "basic," "intermediate," and "complex."
Do you want your site to perform online transactions? And
do you want your site to electronically interact with your
software systems? If the answer to both questions is no, you
most likely need a basic site and should spend anywhere from
$500 to $30,000 for the site's initial design (what it looks
like) and development (how it works). But if the answer to
either is yes, then the price ranges from $2,000 to $3
million, depending on how technologically elaborate and
tailor-made you want the site to be. If at most you want your
site to perform straightforward online transactions, you're in
the intermediate category and should not pay more than
$100,000. But if you want your site to electronically pump
those transactions into a custom-built, one-of-a-kind
accounting system, you're in the complex category, and the
sky's the limit on what you might pay.
Ahrens knew that he'd need a basic site: no more than 15
Web pages and little high-tech work. That alone saved him a
bundle. Intermediate and complex sites cost more because,
among other reasons, they require the labor of software
engineers and computer programmers. Because Ahrens didn't want
to re-create Amazon.com, that labor wasn't necessary for
Zetet.com.
Building an intermediate or complex site engenders
different cost concerns. The pricier sites, besides having
sophisticated E-commerce features, often have detailed
databases that mesh with a company's back-end systems
(including inventory, fulfillment, and accounting). As a
result, building the sites requires lots of costly technical
labor. The precise cost of that labor -- both what the Web
shop pays its employees and what it in turn charges its
customers -- varies widely not just from Web shop to Web shop
but sometimes from client to client.
Money Madness
Among the many factors that influence Web-design rates are
region, shop overhead (like rent and employees), and level of
service provided. (Some shops offer phone tech support; others
offer additional services, such as marketing, public
relations, and logo design, to complement Web pages.) There's
also a bevy of less tangible factors. Some Web-design outfits
lower their prices out of desperation for customers or to add
an impressive client to a portfolio. Others raise prices when
they think a client might willingly pay a higher fee. Matt
Francis, from Marietta, GA, admits that he might quote the
same basic project at two different amounts for two different
customers. A customer who is likely to stick to a project's
initial blueprint usually gets a cheaper quote than a customer
who seems likely to request alterations at every stage of the
project. Francis gauges a customer's likeliness to amend the
project mostly by instinct, based on the customer's seeming
skittishness. Depending on how many changes Francis
anticipates the customer will make, he can modify his flat fee
by hundreds or thousands of dollars.
Francis, Dossett, and several other Web pros all say they
have encountered small-business owners who are shocked to
learn that professional Web-site building usually costs more
than $1,000. They attribute the sticker shock to two factors:
first, there is a proliferation of Web-design freelancers and
moonlighters who offer their services at bargain prices on job
exchanges; second, some huge companies have run ad campaigns
claiming they can build a legit Web presence for a low
starting cost. Both Dell and IBM, for example, have run offers
to build functional small-business sites for less than $500.
Not enough
attention is paid to what you actually get for those offers,
the Web pros claim. At Dell, it was one year of hosting, a
domain name, and three Web pages. At IBM, it was the same
thing but with only six months of hosting. In short, both
offers were an affordable way to publish a pamphlet in
cyberspace. But neither included the technology needed for
conducting online credit-card transactions or for building a
database of site visitors.
Tim Donahue, cautions that costly as it can be to build a
site, you must avoid the mind-set that once you launch it,
you're done. Keeping a site current -- making sure the links
are live and the content is fresh -- isn't cheap. Sometimes it
requires one dedicated employee, the proverbial Webmaster.
Other times it might even require replacing the shop that
built your site with another that better suits your needs.
■